Winning the Race examines the roots of the serious problems facing black Americans todaypoverty, drugs, and high incarceration ratesand contends that none of the commonly accepted reasons can explain the decline of black communities since the end of segregation in the 1960s. Instead, McWhorter posits that a sense of victimhood and alienation that came to the fore during the civil rights era has persisted to the present day in black culture, even though most blacks today have never experienced the racism of the segregation era.
McWhorter traces the effects of this disempowering conception of black identity, from the validation of living permanently on welfare to gansta raps glorification of irresponsibility and violence as a means of protest. He discusses particularly specious claims of racism, attacks the destructive posturing of black leaders and the hip-hop academics, and laments that a successful black person must be faced with charges of acting white. While acknowledging that racism still exists in America today, McWhorter argues that both blacks and whites must move past blaming racism for every challenge blacks face, and outlines the steps necessary for improving the future of black America.
|Publisher:||Penguin Publishing Group|
|Sold by:||Penguin Group|
|File size:||903 KB|
|Age Range:||18 Years|
About the Author
Table of ContentsWinning The RaceIntroduction
The Birth of the Inner City: The Conventional Wisdom
The Birth of the Inner City, Part One: Indianapolis
The Birth of the Inner City, Part Two: The Saga
Why Are You Talking About Blacks on Welfare?
The Meme of Therapeutic Alienation: Defined by Defiance
What About Black Middle-Class Rage?
What About the View from the Ivory Tower?
Therapeutic Alienation Meets Hitting the Books: "Acting White" and Affirmative Action Revisited
The "Hip-Hop Revolution": Therapeutic Alienation on a Rhythm Track
Therapeutic Alienation as a Plan of Action? New Black Leadership for New Negroes
What People are Saying About This
Splendid. . . . McWhorter’s answers are anything but orthodox. . . . [He] has a keen eye for the foibles of social scientists. (The Wall Street Journal)
Provocative . . . both grounded in history and forward-looking. (Publishers Weekly)
A provocative challenge to conventional wisdom. (USA Today)